Ionizing radiation exposure -- more good than harm? The preponderance of evidence does not support abandoning current standards and regulations

Bussières, André E., Ammendolia, Carlo, Peterson, Cindy et Taylor, John A. M. (2006). Ionizing radiation exposure -- more good than harm? The preponderance of evidence does not support abandoning current standards and regulations. Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 50 (2). pp. 103-106. ISSN 0008-3194

Prévisualisation

PDF Télécharger (64kB) | Prévisualisation

Résumé

The article responds to a commentary by P.A. Oakley and colleagues on "phantom risks" associated with diagnostic ionizing radiation. It examines the evidence in support of revising radiography standards and regulations in chiropractic. The article claims that Oakley and his colleagues provide a biased and unscientific evaluation of the evidence.

Type de document:	Article
Mots-clés libres:	IONIZING radiation RADIOTHERAPY DIAGNOSIS CHIROPRACTIC RADIOGRAPHY
Date de dépôt:	16 avr. 2019 18:10
Dernière modification:	16 avr. 2019 18:10
Version du document déposé:	Version officielle de l'éditeur
URI:	https://depot-e.uqtr.ca/id/eprint/8667

Actions (administrateurs uniquement)

Éditer la notice