Carrier, A., Bolduc, F., Delli-Colli, N., Makela, F., Hudon, A., Caty, M.-È., Duhoux, A. et Beaudoin, M. (2023). Fear of reprisal and change agency in the public health and social service system: Protocol for a sequential mixed methods study. JMIR Research Protocols, 12 . Article e48400. ISSN 1929-0748 DOI 10.2196/48400
Prévisualisation |
PDF
Disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution. Télécharger (641kB) | Prévisualisation |
Résumé
Abract
Background:
Since they are key witnesses to the systemic difficulties and social inequities experienced by vulnerable patients, health and social service (HSS) professionals and clinical managers must act as change agents. Using their expertise to achieve greater social justice, change agents employ a wide range of actions that span a continuum from the clinical (microsystem) to the societal (macrosystem) sphere and involve actors inside and outside the HSS system. Typically, however, clinical professionals and managers act in a circumscribed manner, that is, within the clinical sphere and with patients and colleagues. Among the hypotheses explaining this reduced scope of action is the fear of reprisal. Little is known about the prevalence of this fear and its complex dynamics.
Objective:
The overall aim is to gain a better understanding of the complex dynamic process leading to clinical professionals’ and managers’ fear of reprisal in their change agent actions and senior administrators’ and managers’ determination of wrongdoing. The objectives are (1) to estimate the prevalence of fear of reprisal among clinical professionals and managers; (2) to identify the factors involved in (a) the emergence of this fear among clinical professionals and managers, and (b) the determination of wrongdoing by senior administrators and managers; (3) to describe the process of emergence of (a) the fear of reprisal among clinical professionals and managers, and (b) the determination of wrongdoing by senior administrators and managers; and (4) to document the legal and ethical issues associated with the factors identified (objective 2) and the processes described (objective 3).
Methods:
Based on the Exit, Voice, Loyalty, Neglect model, a 3-part sequential mixed methods design will include (1) a web-based survey (objective 1), (2) a qualitative grounded theory design (objectives 2 and 3), and (3) legal and ethical analysis (objective 4). Survey: 77,794 clinical professionals or clinical managers working in the Québec public HSS system will be contacted via email. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. Grounded theory design: for each of the 3 types of participants (clinical professionals, clinical managers, and senior administrators and managers), a theoretical sample of 15 to 30 people will be selected via various strategies. Data will be independently analyzed using constant comparison process. Legal and ethical analysis: situations described by participants will be analyzed using, respectively, applicable legislation and jurisprudence and 2 ethical models.
Results:
This ongoing study began in June 2022 and is scheduled for completion by March 2027.
Conclusions:
Instead of acting, fear of reprisal could induce clinical professionals to tolerate situations that run counter to their social justice values. To ensure they use their capacities for serving a population that is or could become vulnerable, it is important to know the prevalence of the fear of reprisal and gain a better understanding of its complex dynamics.
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/48400
Type de document: | Article |
---|---|
Mots-clés libres: | Change agency Fear Professional practice Retaliation Social justice |
Date de dépôt: | 15 janv. 2024 14:48 |
Dernière modification: | 15 janv. 2024 14:48 |
Version du document déposé: | Version officielle de l'éditeur |
URI: | https://depot-e.uqtr.ca/id/eprint/11087 |
Actions (administrateurs uniquement)
Éditer la notice |