Non-operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: An updated systematic review

Téléchargements

Téléchargements par mois depuis la dernière année

Plus de statistiques...

Ammendolia, C., Hofkirchner, C., Plener, J., Bussières, A., Schneider, M. J., Young, J. J., Furlan, A. D., Stuber, K., Ahmed, A., Cancelliere, C., Adeboyejo, A. et Ornelas, J. (2022). Non-operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: An updated systematic review. BMJ Open, 12 (1). e057724. ISSN 2044-6055 DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057724

[thumbnail of BUSSIERES_A_176_ED.pdf]
Prévisualisation
PDF
Télécharger (1MB) | Prévisualisation

Résumé

Objectives Neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a growing health problem in older adults. We updated our previous Cochrane review (2013) to determine the effectiveness of non-operative treatment of LSS with neurogenic claudication.Design A systematic review.Data sources CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Index to Chiropractic Literature databases were searched and updated up to 22 July 2020.Eligibility criteria We only included randomised controlled trials published in English where at least one arm provided data on non-operative treatment and included participants diagnosed with neurogenic claudication with imaging confirmed LSS.Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 1. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used for evidence synthesis.Results Of 15 200 citations screened, 156 were assessed and 23 new trials were identified. There is moderate-quality evidence from three trials that: Manual therapy and exercise provides superior and clinically important short-term improvement in symptoms and function compared with medical care or community-based group exercise; manual therapy, education and exercise delivered using a cognitive-behavioural approach demonstrates superior and clinically important improvements in walking distance in the immediate to long term compared with self-directed home exercises and glucocorticoid plus lidocaine injection is more effective than lidocaine alone in improving statistical, but not clinically important improvements in pain and function in the short term. The remaining 20 new trials demonstrated low-quality or very low-quality evidence for all comparisons and outcomes, like the findings of our original review.Conclusions There is moderate-quality evidence that a multimodal approach which includes manual therapy and exercise, with or without education, is an effective treatment and that epidural steroids are not effective for the management of LSS with neurogenic claudication. All other non-operative interventions provided insufficient quality evidence to make conclusions on their effectiveness.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020191860.All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Type de document: Article
Date de dépôt: 24 mai 2022 12:59
Dernière modification: 24 mai 2022 13:09
Version du document déposé: Version officielle de l'éditeur
URI: https://depot-e.uqtr.ca/id/eprint/10176

Actions (administrateurs uniquement)

Éditer la notice Éditer la notice